Jump to content

Member Contact Methods

From Mensa Wiki
Revision as of 23:34, 3 June 2026 by BethWeiss (talk | contribs) (Related)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Words of Wisdom

Use a mix of contact methods and adapt based on what works—personalization matters more than the method.

Members have different communication preferences, and flexibility improves effectiveness.

What Success Looks Like

  • Members are reached through at least one method
  • Outreach feels personal and welcoming
  • Members respond in a way that works for them
  • The approach is manageable and repeatable

Best Practices

  • Use more than one method when appropriate
  • Keep outreach simple and personal
  • Adjust based on what gets responses
  • Respect member preferences and boundaries
  • Focus on connection, not just completion

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying on a single contact method
  • Sending long generic or mass-style messages
  • Over-contacting without response
  • Avoiding follow-up after initial outreach
  • Assuming preferences based on age or assumptions

Purpose

[edit | hide all | hide | edit source]

Provide guidance on selecting and using member contact methods effectively, recognizing that communication preferences vary.

What This Means in Practice

[edit | hide | edit source]
  • Start with one method, and follow up with another if needed
  • Personalization matters more than the specific method
  • Respect boundaries and responsiveness
  • Use the methods you can sustain consistently
  • Use member contact information only for legitimate Mensa purposes
  • Respect requests regarding communication preferences

Key Actions

[edit | hide | edit source]

Use a Mix of Contact Methods

[edit | hide | edit source]

No single approach will reach everyone:

  • Some members appreciate postal mail
  • Some prefer quick, informal contact (text or email)
  • Some respond best after multiple touchpoints

Using more than one method—when appropriate—can improve response rates.

Prioritize Personalization

[edit | hide | edit source]

Regardless of method:

  • Use the member’s name
  • Reference their membership or interests when possible
  • Keep messages short and genuine

A simple, personal message is more effective than a longer, generic one.

See: Making It Personal

Matching the Method to the Situation

[edit | hide | edit source]
Situation Possible Approach
New member welcome Postal mail, email, or phone
No response to initial contact Try a different contact method
Sharing resources or links Email
Quick reminder or check-in Text message
Complex conversation Phone or in-person discussion
No response after multiple attempts Pause outreach and try again at a later date

Contact Methods

[edit | hide | edit source]
Method Strengths Considerations Best Used For
Postal Mail
  • Stands out
  • Personal
  • Memorable
  • Slower
  • Cost involved
  • New member welcomes
  • Personal notes
Phone
  • Highly personal
  • Immediate interaction
  • Many members do not answer unknown numbers
  • Time intensive
  • Follow-up conversations
  • Complex questions
Email
  • Easy to scale
  • Allows detailed information
  • Can be overlooked
  • Easy to make feel impersonal
  • Initial outreach
  • Sharing resources
Text Message
  • High visibility
  • Quick responses
  • Clearly identify yourself (Hi, this is <name> from <Local Group>)
  • Keep brief
  • Introductions
  • Follow-ups
  • Reminders
Social Media / Messaging Apps
  • Convenient for ongoing interaction
  • Not all members participate
  • Continuing engagement
  • Informal communication
[edit | hide | edit source]