Jump to content

Engagement Levels Overview: Difference between revisions

From Mensa Wiki
BethWeiss (talk | contribs)
Created
 
BethWeiss (talk | contribs)
m Initial content
Line 1: Line 1:
With a table like:
== Purpose ==
Provide a simple framework for understanding and designing member engagement across different levels of participation.
 
== Guiding Principle ==
Members engage in different ways — and all forms of participation are valid.
 
A strong Local Group offers multiple ways to connect, without requiring members to engage in a specific way.
 
== The Engagement Spectrum ==
 
Engagement is not a binary (active vs inactive). It is a spectrum:
 
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!Level
! Level !! Primary Goal !! Typical Experience !! Examples
!Goal
!Examples
|-
|-
|Low
| Low Commitment || Easy entry || Flexible, optional, low-pressure || Coffee meetups, newsletters, virtual chats
|Easy entry
|Coffee, newsletter
|-
|-
|Medium
| Medium Engagement || Build connection || Some structure, repeat participation || Book clubs, workshops, group outings
|Build connection
|Book clubs, workshops
|-
|-
|High
| High Engagement || Create ownership || Responsibility, leadership, contribution || Hosting events, committees, leadership roles
|Create ownership
|Hosting, leadership
|}
|}
== How the Levels Work Together ==
These levels are not steps that members must follow.
* Members may stay at one level indefinitely 
* Members may move between levels over time 
* Different levels meet different needs 
The goal is not to “move everyone up” — it is to provide options.
== Why This Framework Matters ==
Using engagement levels helps Local Groups:
* Reach more members 
* Reduce barriers to participation 
* Support different interests and availability 
* Build sustainable volunteer pipelines 
A group that only offers one level will unintentionally exclude members.
== Designing a Balanced Activity Mix ==
A healthy Local Group offers a mix of engagement levels over time.
Example:
* Low: casual meetup or newsletter engagement 
* Medium: recurring discussion group 
* High: member-led event or committee 
Balance matters more than any single activity.
== Using This Framework in Practice ==
When planning activities, ask:
* What level of engagement does this activity support? 
* Who is this designed for? 
* Are we offering enough variety across levels? 
This helps ensure your calendar serves a broad range of members.
== Common Misconceptions ==
* '''“High engagement is better.”''' 
  → Not true. All levels are valuable.
* '''“We should push members to participate more.”''' 
  → Engagement should be invited, not pressured.
* '''“Non-attending members are disengaged.”''' 
  → Many members engage through communication, identity, or passive participation.
== Key Takeaway ==
A strong Local Group does not try to maximize participation in one way.
It creates multiple ways for members to feel connected — on their own terms.
== Related ==
* [[Member Engagement]]
* [[Ideas for Group Activities]]
* [[Low-Commitment Activities]]
* [[Medium-Engagement Activities]]
* [[High-Engagement Activities]]
* [[Events and Activities]]

Revision as of 15:12, 25 March 2026

Purpose

Provide a simple framework for understanding and designing member engagement across different levels of participation.

Guiding Principle

Members engage in different ways — and all forms of participation are valid.

A strong Local Group offers multiple ways to connect, without requiring members to engage in a specific way.

The Engagement Spectrum

Engagement is not a binary (active vs inactive). It is a spectrum:

Level Primary Goal Typical Experience Examples
Low Commitment Easy entry Flexible, optional, low-pressure Coffee meetups, newsletters, virtual chats
Medium Engagement Build connection Some structure, repeat participation Book clubs, workshops, group outings
High Engagement Create ownership Responsibility, leadership, contribution Hosting events, committees, leadership roles

How the Levels Work Together

These levels are not steps that members must follow.

  • Members may stay at one level indefinitely
  • Members may move between levels over time
  • Different levels meet different needs

The goal is not to “move everyone up” — it is to provide options.

Why This Framework Matters

Using engagement levels helps Local Groups:

  • Reach more members
  • Reduce barriers to participation
  • Support different interests and availability
  • Build sustainable volunteer pipelines

A group that only offers one level will unintentionally exclude members.

Designing a Balanced Activity Mix

A healthy Local Group offers a mix of engagement levels over time.

Example:

  • Low: casual meetup or newsletter engagement
  • Medium: recurring discussion group
  • High: member-led event or committee

Balance matters more than any single activity.

Using This Framework in Practice

When planning activities, ask:

  • What level of engagement does this activity support?
  • Who is this designed for?
  • Are we offering enough variety across levels?

This helps ensure your calendar serves a broad range of members.

Common Misconceptions

  • “High engagement is better.”
 → Not true. All levels are valuable.
  • “We should push members to participate more.”
 → Engagement should be invited, not pressured.
  • “Non-attending members are disengaged.”
 → Many members engage through communication, identity, or passive participation.

Key Takeaway

A strong Local Group does not try to maximize participation in one way.

It creates multiple ways for members to feel connected — on their own terms.