Jump to content

Engagement Levels Overview: Difference between revisions

From Mensa Wiki
BethWeiss (talk | contribs)
BethWeiss (talk | contribs)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Words of Wisdom WOW only
| wisdom =
Members engage in different ways — and all forms of participation are valid.
A strong Local Group offers multiple ways for members to feel connected, without requiring members to engage in a specific way.
}}
== Purpose ==
== Purpose ==
Provide a simple framework for understanding and designing member engagement across different levels of participation.
Provide a simple framework for understanding and designing member engagement across different levels of participation.
== Guiding Principle ==
Members engage in different ways — and all forms of participation are valid.
A strong Local Group offers multiple ways to connect, without requiring members to engage in a specific way.


== The Engagement Spectrum ==
== The Engagement Spectrum ==
Line 16: Line 18:
| [[Low-Commitment Activities|Low Commitment]]|| Easy entry || Flexible, optional, low-pressure || Coffee meetups, newsletters, virtual chats
| [[Low-Commitment Activities|Low Commitment]]|| Easy entry || Flexible, optional, low-pressure || Coffee meetups, newsletters, virtual chats
|-
|-
| [[Medium-Engagement|Medium Engagement]]|| Build connection || Some structure, repeat participation || Book clubs, workshops, group outings
| [[Medium-Engagement Activities|Medium Engagement]]|| Build connection || Some structure, repeat participation || Book clubs, workshops, group outings
|-
|-
| [[High-Engagement Activities|High Engagement]]|| Create ownership || Responsibility, leadership, contribution || Hosting events, committees, leadership roles
| [[High-Engagement Activities|High Engagement]]|| Create ownership || Responsibility, leadership, contribution || Hosting events, committees, leadership roles
Line 43: Line 45:


== Designing a Balanced Activity Mix ==
== Designing a Balanced Activity Mix ==
A healthy Local Group offers opportunities across multiple engagement levels.


A healthy Local Group offers a mix of engagement levels over time.
{| class="wikitable"
 
! Engagement Level !! Typical Focus !! Examples
Example:
|-
 
| Low
* Low: casual meetup or newsletter engagement 
| Easy entry
* Medium: recurring discussion group 
| Casual or drop-in activities
* High: member-led event or committee 
|-
| Medium
| Connection and consistency
| Recurring groups or structured activities
|-
| High
| Ownership and contribution
| Organizing, hosting, or leadership opportunities
|}


Balance matters more than any single activity.
Balance matters more than any single activity.
Line 65: Line 76:


== Common Misconceptions ==
== Common Misconceptions ==
* '''High engagement is better.'''
** All engagement levels are valuable.


* '''“High engagement is better.'''
* '''Members should be encouraged to participate more.'''
  → Not true. All levels are valuable.
** Engagement should be invited, not pressured.


* '''“We should push members to participate more.”''' 
* '''“Non-attending members are disengaged.”'''
  → Engagement should be invited, not pressured.
** Many members engage through communication, identity, or passive participation.
 
* '''“Non-attending members are disengaged.”'''
  → Many members engage through communication, identity, or passive participation.
 
== Key Takeaway ==
 
A strong Local Group does not try to maximize participation in one way.
 
It creates multiple ways for members to feel connected — on their own terms.
== Related ==
== Related ==
* [[Member Engagement]]
* [[Member Engagement]]
* [[Local Group Events and Activities]]
* [[Local Group Events and Activities]]
* [[Ideas for Group Activities]]
* [[Low-Commitment Activities]]
* [[Low-Commitment Activities]]
* [[Medium-Engagement Activities]]
* [[Medium-Engagement Activities]]
* [[High-Engagement Activities]]
* [[High-Engagement Activities]]
* [[Events and Activities]]
* [[Main Page|Local Group Toolkit]]

Latest revision as of 04:57, 1 June 2026

Words of Wisdom

Members engage in different ways — and all forms of participation are valid.

A strong Local Group offers multiple ways for members to feel connected, without requiring members to engage in a specific way.

Purpose

[edit | hide all | hide | edit source]

Provide a simple framework for understanding and designing member engagement across different levels of participation.

The Engagement Spectrum

[edit | hide | edit source]

Engagement is not a binary (active vs inactive). It is a spectrum:

Level Primary Goal Typical Experience Examples
Low Commitment Easy entry Flexible, optional, low-pressure Coffee meetups, newsletters, virtual chats
Medium Engagement Build connection Some structure, repeat participation Book clubs, workshops, group outings
High Engagement Create ownership Responsibility, leadership, contribution Hosting events, committees, leadership roles

How the Levels Work Together

[edit | hide | edit source]

These levels are not steps that members must follow.

  • Members may stay at one level indefinitely
  • Members may move between levels over time
  • Different levels meet different needs

The goal is not to “move everyone up” — it is to provide options.

Why This Framework Matters

[edit | hide | edit source]

Using engagement levels helps Local Groups:

  • Reach more members
  • Reduce barriers to participation
  • Support different interests and availability
  • Build sustainable volunteer pipelines

A group that only offers one level will unintentionally exclude members.

Designing a Balanced Activity Mix

[edit | hide | edit source]

A healthy Local Group offers opportunities across multiple engagement levels.

Engagement Level Typical Focus Examples
Low Easy entry Casual or drop-in activities
Medium Connection and consistency Recurring groups or structured activities
High Ownership and contribution Organizing, hosting, or leadership opportunities

Balance matters more than any single activity.

Using This Framework in Practice

[edit | hide | edit source]

When planning activities, ask:

  • What level of engagement does this activity support?
  • Who is this designed for?
  • Are we offering enough variety across levels?

This helps ensure your calendar serves a broad range of members.

Common Misconceptions

[edit | hide | edit source]
  • High engagement is better.
    • All engagement levels are valuable.
  • Members should be encouraged to participate more.
    • Engagement should be invited, not pressured.
  • “Non-attending members are disengaged.”
    • Many members engage through communication, identity, or passive participation.
[edit | hide | edit source]